The last few weeks have been very productive. GLWT is taking of in all parts of the world. There has been plenty of interest from TV station in Australia, NY, South Africa and many others. We will be announcing the different screening dates as they come online. If you can not wait that long, help your self and buy a copy of GLWT online at www.breakenback.com.
It is great to see that Breakenback Films is steadily growing as a company and in its fan base. Our different websites are getting more and more “Friends”, and if you are not one of them yet then feel free to join us.
It has again been a few weeks since the last blog, and I must say that even that many things are happening behind the scenes, most of it is paperwork related and/or marketing. So not very interesting to read I guess, so I would like to use this space again and talk about a subject that really has annoyed me over the last few weeks.
There are actually two things, one is the question of who can call them selves an independent film?
The other, is the never ending story of “tight arse” friends, and “I so wanna see your movie, can you borrow or give me a free copy” friends?
While promoting GLWT I came across so many films that promote them selves as independents. What does that mean? Well it USED to mean films that have not been produced by a major studio and with little finance. But then with a growing film industry, many independents became just as big and rich as some of the major film studios. With so many big production houses that now were financially sound to produce blockbusters, it was time to redefine the “Independents”. So “Independents” became projects that generally had no funding, or projects funded through someone’s credit card. Basically films with no financial back up or studio behind them!
Your question now is probably: “So what??? And what are you trying to say, dude?”
Before I come to the point, I would like to use a sports analogy. There was a time were the Olympics use to put up the best amateur athletes against each other to compete. But in the modern Olympics the amateurs compete against the pros. The difference is that an amateur athlete does not have the luxury of getting up every morning going to training, eating an athletes meal, sleeping, Getting a massage, training some more and then at the end of the day getting paid for it, while being taken care of by a staff of PAs and trainers.
The amateur athlete has to get up a lot earlier to train, so he/she is not late for work, then have cheap food, work some more, go to training again, and pray that there is enough money to pay the bills, otherwise some training time must be replaced with a second job.
Now when those two athletes get to the Olympics, guess who is going to have a better chance of wining? We all know life is not fair, but who really wants to see a race/contest/fight/competition, where from the very beginning it is clear what the outcome will be. Unless you have a bet going and you are in need of wining some money, it is really a boring affair. Not to mention that sometimes on a very rare occasion the amateurs are victorious, and that’s why they usually get a lot more praise and respect, as their accomplishment is a much bigger one. Stories like that get then turned into films.
In terms of film making that means, that a lot of studio and proper financed films call them selves independent nowadays. And so they get compared to the films that have been made with a minimal crew and no budget at all most of the time. After speaking to many of the movie audience members over the years, I realized that many viewers would comment on independents films, but rarely would know that some of the “independents” they would critique, had budgets in the millions of dollars and others had zero.
We all know they are exceptions in this world, but today I would like to speak about the majority, and the majority of financed films, will always have better cameras, lighting, sound, SFX, etc… Even with brilliant actors and a fresh story, the quality of the picture and sound will today always be a big part of the movie experience.
So for the audience to be able to look beyond the technical specs of a movie, the word “independent” is meant to get them in a mood of disregard for sound or picture quality, and encourage the engagement in the characters and the story. I believe that we as independent film makers have the right to reserve the word “independent” for real “no/low budget” projects, and don’t have to compete against “independent but financially backed by Sony or WB” projects anymore.
To finish off, a quick brief on the “I so wanna see your movie, can you borrow or give me a free copy” friends.
If I started now a car sale business, would you then come and ask me for a free car? “But a car is a lot more expensive” You say! I say it is the principle, since you do not go to Sony, WB, Etc. And ask them for a free DVD, and they can afford to give you one, please act like a grown up and buy a copy of GLWT. Help us grow and enable us to continue making films that so many of our fans already enjoy. If you would take your self and a friend out to the cinema in Sydney, you would spend 30- plus.
Save your self 10.- and buy a copy of GLWT. And then email me and tell me how much better you feel since you then know that you have helped spreading the word of “Good Luck With That”